Review: Enterprises are Keen to Carryout Circuit Card Prototyping On-site
Polling of printed circuit board (PCB) designers and producers, domestic electricians, Original equipment manufacturers and other people fascinated with 3D-printed PCB boards and circuits unveils that there’s definitely growing demand for in-house prototyping for exploration and product development. The interest is primarily keen among companies which expend at least as much as $100,000 yearly for prototyping support.
Of the approximately 975 answerers – which represent 31 industries and disciplines and 25 nations around the world – undertaking the market research executed by Nano Dimension Ltd., 70 percent pay nearly $50,000 and 14 % said they spend more money than $50,000 annually on electronic circuit board prototyping. Moreover, a full 16 percent, or 142 answerers, are investing more than $100,000 to delegated prototyping vendors each and every year. Almost all participants said that the prototyping charges were huge for the reason that call for the manufacturing of advanced, multi-layer circuit boards – with 66 per cent of those surveyed indicating their designs come with multiple layers.
While more than 9 in 10 answerers said their firms make use of offsite prototyping plants currently, close to 2 in 3 proclaimed they presume their intellectual property (IP) is in jeopardy every time they do so. Many state they really wish options for producing their own PCBs in house.
“Designers and technical engineers definitely expect shorter turn-around times and lower danger each time giving out their design documents for prototyping,” said Simon Fried, Nano Dimension’s Chief Business Officer and a company co-founder. “But with virtually all of the production houses in China, timeliness isn’t an option. In truth, in some cases they end up with circuit cards for production that aren’t enhanced as much as they would like because of the long lead times. And sending out designs usually heightens the likelihood which the IP could be replicated or thieved.”
Despite that the prototyping houses are truly known partners, the time constraints related to outsourcing can constrain creativity. A lot designers depend on “safe” PCB board designs in lieu of exploring innovative new ideas for fear they may lead to multiple iterations – and additional delays – with the prototyping facility.
“With innovative options just like Nano Dimension’s DragonFly 2020 3D Printer, the electronics market can ultimately catch up to other forms of manufacturing that have benefited from additive manufacturing,” Fried said. “Our survey suggests the demand exists, and the market is ready for 3D-printed PCBs that can be manufactured on-site immediately and affordably.”
Nano Dimension, a leader in 3D printed electronics, sponsors the poll on its web-site. Contributors speak for industries covering everything from circuit card producers and OEMs to engineering, defense, manufacturing, aerospace, electronics, medical-related, sensors and wearables, telecoms, energy and many others.